US SUPREME COURT BANS MANDATORY PUBLIC UNION FEES

US SUPREME COURT BANS MANDATORY PUBLIC UNION FEES

Mandatory Public Sector Union Fees Ruled Unconstitutional; Violate First Amendment

Today, in a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court overturned 40 years of precedent by ruling that mandatory public sector union dues are unconstitutional.

The case, Janus v. AFSCME Council 31, U.S., No. 16-1466, overturns the 1977 decision in Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, which held that government employees could be required to pay agency or fair-share fees to cover the cost of collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustments—but that employees can’t be forced to cover a union’s political activities.

Mark Janus, an Illinois public sector employee, challenged an Illinois law that required non-union workers to pay agency fees. Janus was forced to pay $44 a month in agency shop fees to the AFSCME union. Agency shop fees are paid by those public sector employees who choose not to belong to a union but are still covered by a collective bargaining agreement.  Janus argued that requiring him to pay these fees was a violation of his First Amendment rights.

The Supreme Court found Janus’ argument persuasive, agreeing that the First Amendment prohibits public sector entities from collecting fees from non-union workers without their consent. Justice Samuel Alito Jr., writing for the majority, stated “Neither an agency fee nor any other payment to the union may be deducted from a nonmember’s wages, nor may any other attempt be made to collect such a payment, unless the employee affirmatively consents to pay.” Chief Justice John Roberts Jr., and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, and Neil Gorsuch joined in the majority opinion.

This decision makes every state a right-to-work state for public sector employees. What does this mean? It is now illegal for public sector employers to require workers to join a union or pay related fees as a condition of employment. Many states, including Nevada, have similar laws on the books for private sector employees.

Union membership in the United States has experienced a significant decline in recent years. In 2017, 10.7% of workers in the United States were union members. That accounts for about 7.2 million public sector employees and 7.6 million private sector employees. For comparison, in 1983, 20% of workers in the United States were union members.

United States Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan wrote the dissenting opinion. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen G. Breyer, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg followed suit. Justice Elena Kagan shared a summary of the dissenting opinion from the bench; this act symbolized the robust resistance to the final ruling. Recent Supreme Court rulings suggest a pattern that favors the conservative side of the isle.

See Why Nevada Employers Trust NAE

Posted on Google Google
Kevin Lennon profile picture
Kevin Lennon
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
We have relied on NAE for training and compliance support for several years and havealways been impressed with the professionalism ofthe organization. Their programs are informative, well organized,and extremely beneficial for employers and supervisors.
Posted on Google Google
janek ott profile picture
janek ott
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Working with Thoran Towler has beena great experience. He is approachable, professional, and incrediblyknowledgeable about employment law and HRcompliance. His advice has helped our company navigate severalchallenging workplace situations successfully.
Posted on Google Google
Blake Wilbur profile picture
Blake Wilbur
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
NAE provides practical HR solutionsthat are actually useful for employers. Their guidance is realistic, timely, and tailoredto the challenges businesses face today. Thoran Towler has created an organization thattruly understands Nevada employers.
Posted on Google Google
Andrew Zellman profile picture
Andrew Zellman
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
The NAE Employers Conference was one of the best business events we have attended. The speakers were excellent, the topics werehighly relevant, and the event was extremely wellorganized. Thoran Towler and the NAE team created anoutstanding experience for attendees.
Posted on Google Google
Victoria Denise Peñalba profile picture
Victoria Denise Peñalba
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Our organization has utilized several NAE services, including policy reviews,supervisor training, and HR consultations. Every interaction has been professional andhelpful. Thoran and his team consistently go above andbeyond to support Nevada employers.
Posted on Google Google
Shani Biju profile picture
Shani Biju
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Thoran Towler is one of the most knowledgeable employment law professionals we haveworked with. He takes complicated HR and legal topics andexplains them in a practical, business focusedmanner that is easy to understand and apply.
Posted on Google Google
L T profile picture
L T
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Great conference
Posted on Google Google
Stephanie Neuhart profile picture
Stephanie Neuhart
Google star 1Google star 2Google star 3Google star 4Google star 5Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Having a wonderful time with team at NAE conference